Quran Chapter 2- 233b (Pt-2, Stg-1) (L-304) - درس قرآن
Weaning the child by mutual consent
Surah
‘Al-Baqarah (The Cow) – Chapter – 2)
‘A-‘uu-zu Billaahi minash-Shay-taanir- Rajiim.
(I seek refuge in God from Satan the outcast.)
Bis-Millaahir-Rah-maanir-Rahiim.
(In the name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful.)
(I seek refuge in God from Satan the outcast.)
Bis-Millaahir-Rah-maanir-Rahiim.
(In the name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful.)
وَٱلْوَٰلِدَٰتُ يُرْضِعْنَأَوْلَٰدَهُنَّ حَوْلَيْنِ كَامِلَيْنِ لِمَنْ أَرَادَ أَن يُتِمَّ ٱلرَّضَاعَةَ وَعَلَى ٱلْمَوْلُودِ لَهُۥ رِزْقُهُنَّ وَكِسْوَتُهُنَّ بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ لَا تُكَلَّفُ نَفْسٌ إِلَّا وُسْعَهَا لَا تُضَآرَّ وَٰلِدَةٌۢبِوَلَدِهَا وَلَا مَوْلُودٌ لَّهُۥ بِوَلَدِهِۦ وَعَلَى ٱلْوَارِثِ مِثْلُ ذَٰلِكَ فَإِنْ أَرَادَا فِصَالًا عَن تَرَاضٍ مِّنْهُمَا وَتَشَاوُرٍ فَلَا جُنَاحَ عَلَيْهِمَا وَإِنْ أَرَدتُّمْ أَن تَسْتَرْضِعُوٓا۟أَوْلَٰدَكُمْ فَلَا جُنَاحَ عَلَيْكُمْ إِذَا سَلَّمْتُم مَّآ ءَاتَيْتُم بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَٱعْلَمُوٓا۟ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ 233
233b. And on the (father’s) heir is
incumbent the like of that (which was incumbent on the father). If they
desire to wean the child by mutual consent and (after) consultation, it is no
sin for them; and if ye wish to give your children out to nurse, it is no sin
for you, provided that ye pay what is due from you in kindness. And observe
your duty to Allah, and know that Allah is Seer of what ye do.
|
233b. Wa
‘alal-waarisi mislu zaalik. Fa-‘in ‘araadaa
fisaalan ‘an taraazim-min-humaa wa
tashaa-wurin- falaa junaaha ‘alayhi-maa. Wa ‘in
‘arattum ‘an- tas-tar-zi-‘uuu ‘awlaadakum falaa
junaaha ‘alaykum ‘izaa sallamtum-maaa
‘aataytum- bil-ma’-ruuf. Watta-qUllaaha wa’-lamuuu
‘annAllaaha bimaa ta’-maluuna Basiir.
|
Commentary
‘Al-waarisi – (heir), heir
means that intimate relative who is lawful heir after the father.
Mislu zaalik – (incumbent)
the like of that, it means that as incumbent (protection of rights) regarding
the child’s mother is on the father, like this the incumbent is also on the
nearest relative after the father.
It is father’s
responsibility to bear the expenses for bringing up his child and when he dies,
then it is the order that if the child is owner of wealth/property, then his
expenditures will be taken from that wealth, and if he doesn’t have any
wealth/property, then those persons who are from his intimate rich relatives,
and besides being intimate relatives they are also lawful heirs, then it is
their duty to bear the child’s expenditures. Reason for assuming the charges of
an innocent suckling child on others, is that the child has not power to bring
him up himself. Another thing also appears from it that expenses for the lives
of poor women, cripple men and minors are incumbent on their relatives.
After that it has also
been instructed that if the parents want to wean the child by mutual consent
and (after) consultation, then it is no sin for them. The mother has more right
to bring the child up due to her kind feelings. So the matters relating to the
child have not been left on the opinion of only father. Then it has been
cleared too that in some circumstances; when it has become necessary to get
suckled the child from any other woman, then it is no sin also, provided that
she has been paid remuneration.
No comments:
Post a Comment